Oregon’s voter data is publicly available and claims that it’s hidden are fiction. The real dispute was about processes and records, not access, but that truth gets buried under louder narratives.
Obviously Ben, you haven’t read Seth Keshel’s book “Election Corruption.” He specifically calls out CA, WA, and Oregon and voter registration corruption. “Automatic voter registration provides the credit line for fraudulent voting and must be ended.” There is more work involved than downloading a list Ben. The state needs to do the responsible work they owe the nation by providing a list that is clean and cross checked with federal records.
Seth Keshel has not delivered credible evidence, he is one of the election integrity grifters I refer to, including Douglas Frank. These two mix bad science, speculation and use predictive modeling no better than climate prediction to claim fraud without proof. If there is illegal votes, it would not take much effort to reveal them, yet not a single deceased voter record has been resurrected from the data.
Yes, well why would you want to believe a former Army Captain in Military Intelligence in Afghanistan? He wouldn’t know how to do research? Ya right. And you aren’t a grifter? You don’t own the truth. https://www.westernjournal.com/author/skeshel/
From your points here, then there is no way we should be able to use science and statistics to understand anything because pattern does not equal proof. How can we put repeat offenders in prison if pattern does not equal proof?? You are not specifically citing an instance where input was invalidated. 🧐 Your point input sounds more like a bad talking point from a leftist perspective. Kershel is a Republican and Newt Gingrich wrote the forward to his book.
Your logic doesn't hold up. Repeat offenders are proven in court to be guilty, with evidence, and therefore we increase the penalty. The algorithms claims and claims of election fraud I limit my criticism of Ketshel to what I know to be factual evidence in Oregon election processes. The forward by Gingrich may help him sell books and speaking gigs but it lends nothing to the credibility of his claims. That's like suggesting Bill Clinton is honorable because Trump maintained a friendly relationship with the Clintons, praised Bill Clinton as a "great president" in 2008, donated to the Clinton Foundation, and invited them to his 2005 wedding. We all need to take a step back and question our own confirmation bias. I meet Republicans everywhere that don't live up to my experience as a conservative Reagan Republican.
You are like the people defending the Covid jab. There are still some of them out there you know? Most of us understand now that government corruption started at the ballot box, and was moved by democrats in Oregon to the mail box.
Obviously Ben, you haven’t read Seth Keshel’s book “Election Corruption.” He specifically calls out CA, WA, and Oregon and voter registration corruption. “Automatic voter registration provides the credit line for fraudulent voting and must be ended.” There is more work involved than downloading a list Ben. The state needs to do the responsible work they owe the nation by providing a list that is clean and cross checked with federal records.
Seth Keshel has not delivered credible evidence, he is one of the election integrity grifters I refer to, including Douglas Frank. These two mix bad science, speculation and use predictive modeling no better than climate prediction to claim fraud without proof. If there is illegal votes, it would not take much effort to reveal them, yet not a single deceased voter record has been resurrected from the data.
Yes, well why would you want to believe a former Army Captain in Military Intelligence in Afghanistan? He wouldn’t know how to do research? Ya right. And you aren’t a grifter? You don’t own the truth. https://www.westernjournal.com/author/skeshel/
Many have looked at the claims. The criticism boils down to:
1. Questionable inputs
Assumptions about “expected” turnout or registration patterns
Often not grounded in how elections actually vary by county
2. Pattern ≠ proof
Finding something “weird” statistically does NOT equal fraud
Real-world elections are messy (demographics, turnout shifts, mail voting, etc.)
3. No validation
Claims don’t hold up when checked against:
Certified results
Audits
Court cases
From your points here, then there is no way we should be able to use science and statistics to understand anything because pattern does not equal proof. How can we put repeat offenders in prison if pattern does not equal proof?? You are not specifically citing an instance where input was invalidated. 🧐 Your point input sounds more like a bad talking point from a leftist perspective. Kershel is a Republican and Newt Gingrich wrote the forward to his book.
Your logic doesn't hold up. Repeat offenders are proven in court to be guilty, with evidence, and therefore we increase the penalty. The algorithms claims and claims of election fraud I limit my criticism of Ketshel to what I know to be factual evidence in Oregon election processes. The forward by Gingrich may help him sell books and speaking gigs but it lends nothing to the credibility of his claims. That's like suggesting Bill Clinton is honorable because Trump maintained a friendly relationship with the Clintons, praised Bill Clinton as a "great president" in 2008, donated to the Clinton Foundation, and invited them to his 2005 wedding. We all need to take a step back and question our own confirmation bias. I meet Republicans everywhere that don't live up to my experience as a conservative Reagan Republican.
You are like the people defending the Covid jab. There are still some of them out there you know? Most of us understand now that government corruption started at the ballot box, and was moved by democrats in Oregon to the mail box.
Ben, you can argue with me about my logic on this, but the gerrymandering by TK and her democrat lackeys is going down with SCOTUS arriving at a 6 to 3 vote on Louisiana v. Callais. Oh and BTW, https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/feds-sue-29-states-as-massive-voter-roll-audit-uncovers-dead-names-and-non-citizens/ar-AA21grVr so keep up defending Oregon’s corruptocrats while the GOP sees it differently.